Every cyber submission, checked against your controls.
Applications, supplements, questionnaires and incident history resolved into one control picture. Missing controls and appetite conflicts surface before the first read.
Received
2:41 PMDecision-ready
3:12 PM4 documents · 41 answersThe cyber desk
Three things that slow your cyber desk down.
Application, supplement, security questionnaire, incident history. The same control is answered three times, three different ways. Someone reconciles it by hand.
Same-day acknowledgment is table stakes. The first credible response sets the terms. Slow answers move the account.
Revenue bands, sub-limits, industry exclusions, minimum control sets. The manual is tribal knowledge. The file holds documents, not reasoning.
The cyber desk
From application to signed-off decision.
Every document resolved into one control picture. Every guideline running as a rule. Every decision recorded as it happens.
Live · one submission, end to end
One questionnaire, broker email to decided file.
Applications, supplements, security questionnaires, incident history. Any format, parsed into one risk picture before anyone opens the file.
Where documents disagree, both answers are shown and the more specific instrument wins. MFA presence is not MFA scope.
MFA, EDR, backups, patch SLA, training. Gaps surfaced instantly, with the chase message drafted where documentation is missing.
Revenue bands, sub-limit thresholds, industry conflicts, minimum control sets. Triage lands in-appetite, refer or out-of-appetite before hours are spent.
Referrals reach you with the control state and evidence assembled. Terms stay your call. Override anytime, and the reasoning is recorded.
Inputs, sources, control state at bind, rules fired, rationale, approver. Recorded as you decide, reconstructable per decision.
Explainability
Nothing on this screen is a guess.
Every answer traces to the document it came from. Every control shows the evidence behind its state. When two documents disagree, both are shown and the choice is explained.
Multi-factor authentication
Click any control → the document and question that evidenced it
Conflicting answers resolved by instrument specificity, both shown
Control state at bind, preserved on the decision record
Questionnaire preferred by source confidence — scope-level instrument over yes/no · RES-CTRL-04
Control state partial — CYB-SUB-03 caps ransomware sub-limit
Appetite
Built for the cyber classes you write.
Minimum control set and sub-limit availability change at each band.
Controls
Five controls decide most cyber accounts.
Presence is not scope. Each of these is checked against your minimum set, per industry and revenue band, with the evidence attached.
Checked at scope, not yes/no. Email, remote access and privileged accounts assessed separately.
Coverage percentage matters more than presence. Partial deployment is the common finding.
The control that gates the ransomware sub-limit. Restore testing evidence requested where missing.
A stated window is not a demonstrated one. Conflicting answers across documents are common here.
Business email compromise dominates claim frequency. Wire verification procedure checked alongside.
See it on a submission you actually write.
Send us one live submission. We map your program and run it. Fifteen minutes to first output, no pitch deck.